Publications
You can also find a list of my publications at Google Scholar.
2021
Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction using Automatic Hard mining in 3D CNN Architecture.
(link) (bibtex) (source code)
Machine Learning | Data Science | Computer Vision | Deep Learning
You can also find a list of my publications at Google Scholar.
Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction using Automatic Hard mining in 3D CNN Architecture.
(link) (bibtex) (source code)
@InProceedings{10.1007/978-3-030-72087-2_27,
author="Anand, Vikas Kumar
and Grampurohit, Sanjeev
and Aurangabadkar, Pranav
and Kori, Avinash
and Khened, Mahendra
and Bhat, Raghavendra S.
and Krishnamurthi, Ganapathy",
editor="Crimi, Alessandro
and Bakas, Spyridon",
title="Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction Using Automatic Hard Mining in 3D CNN Architecture",
booktitle="Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries",
year="2021",
publisher="Springer International Publishing",
address="Cham",
pages="310--319",
abstract="We utilize 3-D fully convolutional neural networks (CNN) to segment gliomas and its constituents from multimodal Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI). The architecture uses dense connectivity patterns to reduce the number of weights and residual connection and is initialized with weights obtained from training this model with BraTS 2018 dataset. Hard mining is done during training to train for the difficult cases of segmentation tasks by increasing the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) threshold to choose the hard cases as epoch increases. On the BraTS2020 validation data (n = 125), this architecture achieved a tumor core, whole tumor, and active tumor dice of 0.744, 0.876, 0.714, respectively. On the test dataset, we get an increment in DSC of tumor core and active tumor by approximately 7{\%}. In terms of DSC, our network performances on the BraTS 2020 test data are 0.775, 0.815, and 0.85 for enhancing tumor, tumor core, and whole tumor, respectively. Overall survival of a subject is determined using conventional machine learning from rediomics features obtained using generated segmentation mask. Our approach has achieved 0.448 and 0.452 as the accuracy on the validation and test dataset.",
isbn="978-3-030-72087-2"
}